Originally Posted by forzamilan90
+1. That serve was incredible, and he had a monster forehand to back it up (well up until mid 2000s). Without Fed, he probably would have gotten a few Wimbledon trophies
If he was in the 90s with a quicker grass he would have a better shot. He just doesn't get too many free point from his serve against Roger(except 2009 Wimbledon).
Roger is number one - 17 slams; 302 weeks #1, 6 WTF; 5 years end #1; 24 slam finals;4 slam finals back-to-back year; Player of the decade