Originally Posted by dafinch
What is your explanation for Agassi's drug use being covered up? And he was as prominent then as Nadal is now, not to mention, covering up a drug which clearly doesn't help one's tennis would seem to be less necessary than one that does-but they covered it up anyway.
They covered up for Agassi, but they let him continue to play. If Nadal were to be caught doping, then they would cover up for him too and let him continue to play, just like Agassi. That is why the silent ban theory is total bs.