View Single Post
Old 01-03-2013, 06:00 AM   #16
BobbyOne
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
so having 4 slams on clay/grass in comparision to having 4 slams on HC is the very same ?

that more styles of play can succeed on HC than on either clay or grass isn't a factor at all ?????



so is federer's



federer's seasons in 2004,2006 and 2007 ( 3 slam years ) are wayyy ahead of wilander's when in comes to dominance ( see win-loss % )

federer had a win loss record of

74-6 in 2004 (3 slams+YEC)
81-4 in 2005 (2 slams+2 slam semis)
92-5 in 2006 (3 slams+1 slam final+YEC)
68-9 in 2007 ( 3 slams+1 slam final+YEC)

that is concentrated dominance in a calendar year unless you are thick ...only reason he didn't win the GS is in 2006/07 is a certain rafael nadal, the CC GOAT.

Give him instead a totally sub-par Rosewall in a Roland Garros final and he also wins RG in 2006/07 making a clean sweep ...

And you blame me for belittleing Federer and belittle Rosewall as a claycourter...

I heavily doubt that Federer would dominate peak Rosewall on clay.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote