Did Fed benefit from a weak grass era and lack of threats at the top in general from 2004-2007 on all surfaces outside of Nadal on clay? ?
Neither surfaces have been "great" per say in terms of talent and depth from the 2000's-present time. But Nadal would have been all time great on clay in ANY era. Would he have only managed to lose once at the French his entire career thus far in a different era? I highly doubt it but he would have grabbed his fair share regardless of his competition
Last edited by 90's Clay; 01-03-2013 at 09:28 AM.