View Single Post
Old 01-03-2013, 10:30 AM   #403
timnz
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,918
Default So then

Quote:
Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY View Post
Missing the point; after 4 FO finals losing to Nadal, there's no countering evidence to suggest Federer would win that one FO if Nadal happened to be the opponent. There's no getting around that.

That is a fluke....to anyone with an objective view.
So with Nadal out early, are you saying that it was not possible for the 2009 Roland Garros to have a worthy winner? Should the tournament have been stopped after Nadals loss?
timnz is offline   Reply With Quote