Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY
Missing the point; after 4 FO finals losing to Nadal, there's no countering evidence to suggest Federer would win that one FO if Nadal happened to be the opponent. There's no getting around that.
That is a fluke....to anyone with an objective view.
So with Nadal out early, are you saying that it was not possible for the 2009 Roland Garros to have a worthy winner? Should the tournament have been stopped after Nadals loss?