Originally Posted by NickC
Still doesn't take away from the fact that he beat cancer twice and was able to compete as a high level athlete for several years following multiple rounds of intense chemotherapy, and compete in (and complete) one of the most grueling feats of athleticism on the planet less than a year after beating the cancer.
I could give a damn about if he doped or not. The entire sport dopes, so why single out the one dude who won?
Here we go with the rationalizations: "lance is innocent because everyone else is guilty too!" Please, keep posting stupid drivel like this.