View Single Post
Old 01-08-2013, 04:36 AM   #24
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,773

[QUOTE=urban;7104919]Laver was certainly no matinee idol. Just hadn't the looks of a film star. To the contrary he was often described as shy and unassuming man with freckles, hawk nose and bow legs and so on. Just not media-like. The first tennis star who made real money on the media sector by his looks and star appeal was Newcombe, who was built up as a sort of tennis Magnum at Hawai. And there were quite many solid experts then like Maskell, Barrett, McCauley, Bellamy, Clerici, Schröeder, Pignon, and many others who ranked Laver pretty high. I don't think, they all were infiltrated by Bud Collins.[/QUOTE

urban, Paul Metzler, the Australian tennis historian, might be an exception as he ranked Kramer first and Budge second. He did rate Hoad ahead of Laver, just as Dan does now...
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote