View Single Post
Old 01-10-2013, 09:21 AM   #116
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,773

Originally Posted by abmk View Post
@ the thread, a huge no , laver > rosewall ......

laver was the better player at his peak, more versatile, had more firepower , had that je ne sais quoi that rosewall simply didn't ....

only edge rosewall has is his longevity ....
Only an ignorant would say that Rosewall's edge is only his longevity.

There are several fields where Rosewall is greater than Laver but I'm tired to repeat them again and again. You would never be ready to believe me...

I strongly would suggest you to stay on fields where you are an expert, i.e. at the question who had more successful second services, Federer or Nadal in the 2005 to 2009 period or similar topics. In tennis HISTORY you are not an expert, I'm afraid...

Last edited by BobbyOne; 01-10-2013 at 10:17 AM.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote