Originally Posted by dominikk1985
5.0 is a little low, isn't it?
or would you say that john isner or the bryans were only 5.0-5.5 players?
wouldn't 6.0 to 7.0 be more acurate?
Watch some Division 1 tennis and you'll realize that Isner and the Bryan brothers are much better than the average Division 1 player. I was under the impression that a Division 1 player is normally considered a 5.5 player unless there is evidence otherwise. The best players are/are approaching 7.0s. The worst players at D1 are probably 5.0s. There are some D1 players who have ugly games but they are almost all very consistent.