Originally Posted by 5555
I do not see how anyone can make sensible argument to support claim that a donkey is more intellectual than Djokovic.
You mean random articles about traits which have been shown not to correlate at all with intellect?
And you say 'claim', and posted an article in the OP. Does this mean it was a 'sensible argument' to support your CLAIM that Djokovic was more intellectual than Federer and Nadal?
Help me out here, unless your goalposts have shifted.
Also, I never claimed anything. If you think one way or another, PROVE it so it becomes a fact i.e that Djokovic is more intellectual than an ***. Otherwise it is just your opinion that he is.