View Single Post
Old 01-17-2013, 08:17 AM   #74
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,104

Originally Posted by 5555 View Post
I do not see how anyone can make sensible argument to support claim that a donkey is more intellectual than Djokovic.
You mean random articles about traits which have been shown not to correlate at all with intellect?

And you say 'claim', and posted an article in the OP. Does this mean it was a 'sensible argument' to support your CLAIM that Djokovic was more intellectual than Federer and Nadal?

Help me out here, unless your goalposts have shifted.

Also, I never claimed anything. If you think one way or another, PROVE it so it becomes a fact i.e that Djokovic is more intellectual than an ***. Otherwise it is just your opinion that he is.

Last edited by single_handed_champion; 01-17-2013 at 09:10 AM.
single_handed_champion is offline   Reply With Quote