Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth
You're not the brightest bulb in the room either. You said Federer would never make #1 if Djokovic, Nadal and Murray were the same age and then suggest that Federer making #1 at 31 was your point? That sounds incredibly... unclever... to put it mildly.
You still haven't understood MY point. That if Nadal, Djoko and Murray had been the same age as Fed, Fed may never have become #1 to begin with, given that Nadal was infinitely more precocious than him and he would have owned early 20s Fed big time and both Djoko and Murray would have challenged him way more than Rod or Blake on hard, so he would never have acquired the confidence and resume he has now in the first place.