View Single Post
Old 01-18-2013, 01:45 PM   #22
Muppet
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis View Post
Poly is good for players who can't keep the ball in play. Soft, powerful syn gut strings strung at the low end of a tension range is a recipe for a 3.0 to hit the ball long quite often. Instead, if they used a stiff string, low powered poly, with greater access to spin, it will be much easier for them to keep the ball in play.

IMO, the one and only goal in tennis is to keep the ball in play. If you can't hit it within the lines of the court, you can't win. It doesn't matter if you hit with a ton of TS, or if you have 65 mph groundies if they don't land within the court.
This sheds light on how my game has been. I would always use a long, smooth (measured) stroke using multis. I've been trying to incorporate poly strings into my game without great results, until recently. I'm learning the unit turn and a modified eastern grip, from eastern, on the forhand side. I've started getting results from a much faster stroke using a poly/multi hybrid. I'm also switching to a ohbh, but that will take longer before I see progress.
__________________
Dunlop MuscleWeave 200G 95 (350g, 8.5 HL), Cyberflash 1.25/HexMulti 16 @48/53, Alpha Pioneer DC+ dropweight
Muppet is offline   Reply With Quote