Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth
Oh my God. You really think 25 year-old Federer couldn't have done what 31 year-old Federer did?
Her twisted logic is 31 year old Fed still became number 1 only because of the insurmountable confidence that the 25 year old Fed gained by playing a weak field. If Fed were to be in the same age group as the other 3, he would have never been a No 1 at 25 or 31.
Is there any Nobel price award for such logic ?