Originally Posted by tennisaddict
Her twisted logic is 31 year old Fed still became number 1 only because of the insurmountable confidence that the 25 year old Fed gained by playing a weak field. If Fed were to be in the same age group as the other 3, he would have never been a No 1 at 25 or 31.
Is there any Nobel price award for such logic ?
That's like saying Nadal would be a 0-time Slam Champion had he faced Rosol in the 2nd Round of the 2005 French Open