Originally Posted by jonnythan
If he admits it, obviously he did it.
My original objection is unchanged though: it's wrong to strip him of his titles without an actual failed drug test or admission as required by the rules. Now that he has admitted it, it makes sense to strip him of the titles.
Not before, though. It was wrong to do so before there was any physical evidence.
Un-f---ing believable. It's you again. Kick yourself in the nuts for me. Thanks.