View Single Post
Old 01-20-2013, 12:03 PM   #8
julian
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bedford,Massachusetts,US
Posts: 1,756
Default Majority of reasearch disagrees with you

Quote:
Originally Posted by Povl Carstensen View Post
I find it rather revealing that some people have to make up that others propose that you hit the ball backwards, to have something to critisize and be right about. But it made me think about racket head acceleration. During the debate someone put forward (I can't find it now) that the foreward velocity decreases after impact, while the upwards increases. And ofcourse the sideways speed accelerates as the racket goes across the ball and/or body. And it is only natural that the foreward vektor goes down as the upwards and sideways goes up. If you factor them together, I think it is very likely that the combined sum goes up, meaning that the racket in a lot (most?) of typical modern forehands (and other shots as well) accelerate after and through impact. Maybe this is obvious to some, perhaps others disagree. I wonder if the movement in all three planes have been factored together?
Majority of research disagrees with your sentence:
"If you factor them together, I think it is very likely that the combined sum goes up, meaning that the racket in a lot (most?) of typical modern forehands (and other shots as well) accelerate after and through impact. "
Read John Yandell,Andy Fitzell,read some quotes in a paper by Rod Cross
Do NOT talk about intent.

Last edited by julian : 01-20-2013 at 12:10 PM.
julian is offline   Reply With Quote