View Single Post
Old 01-20-2013, 01:30 PM   #45
90's Clay
Legend
 
90's Clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth View Post
He never destroyed Agassi. 20-14 is competitive, considering more matches were played on surfaces favorable to Sampras.

And Sampras only won because Agassi wasn't committed enough and was busy deciding on wigs and doing meth.
Fed is 0-2 vs. Nadal on hard courts at the slams (been losing to Nadal on hard courts since Nadal was wearing Diapers), Fed's arguable best surface, Hands down Nadal's WORSE. Whats Fed's excuse there?

... Oh yea.. Matchup.
90's Clay is offline   Reply With Quote