View Single Post
Old 01-21-2013, 12:50 PM   #32
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,604

Originally Posted by mattennis View Post

Unless somebody creates an "alternative universes computer simulation", trying to compare players or numbers from different tennis eras is senseless.

General concensus thus is to look at # of slams and years at #1.

# of slams can vary depending on era, due to many different situations.
so we have to look how dominant the player was and for how long...
ultradr is offline   Reply With Quote