View Single Post
Old 01-21-2013, 03:46 PM   #55
New User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 45

No that indicates the player was the most successful winning GS championships. Beating your main rival 12% of the time does not denote the greatest.

Take clay away. Why? Federer is a former RG champion and was more successful in Hamburg than Nadal. He stated himself he felt natural playing on clay, why remove an historic surface because it doesn't suit an argument?
ctjpm is offline   Reply With Quote