View Single Post
Old 01-23-2013, 02:42 AM   #2422
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,540

Originally Posted by Flash O'Groove View Post
Yes. As ridiculous it can be to call every new successful player a goat candidate (Djokovic I'm looking at you), it is just as ridiculous to have half of the top-10 players (and the upper half with that) coming from the same fiftiest era.

And the competition ***** is really the *****tiest argument ever.
This is an excellent point. My personal GOAT list contains greats from all eras. However many of the older posters here insist on putting Laver, Rosewall, Gonzales, Hoad, Kramer etc. all right near the very top, as if magically all the greatest players of all time emerged in the period 1948-1960. And then try to claim that minor greats like Segura qualify for a top ten spot all-time because they faced such overwhelming competition, and that Gimeno was far greater than Emerson and Santana because he played in the super-competitive pro tour.

It's obvious they are fanboys of a certain era and not at all objective.
Sloane Stephens and Laura Robson: future WTA world No 1 and 2.
Phoenix1983 is offline   Reply With Quote