Originally Posted by Fedex
Are you sure? Sometimes the orthodox view isn't what it seems.
If you're talking about peaks and not results this guy thinks differently:
"You can't go wrong with Murray. He's the best there is. He's a better player than Nadal and the other top guys."
"Better than Nadal? Better than Federer? Better than Djokovic?" I replied, incredulous.
"Sure, sure. He's more explosive. He has a better back-hand. He has a better serve."
Interview with Pato Alvarez - former national coach for Spain for 16 years, involved in tennis as player and coach for 50 years.
No disrespect to Murray, but I think most people would say that guy has no clue what he's talking about. Even on this court I would give the edge to Roger if he played his A game for most of the match, and overall on all courts, it's even more pronounced IMHO. Problem is, Fed doesn't get there that often for that long these days.