Originally Posted by Fedex
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying how can we possibly ever know.
You can say Federer has 17 slams and all these records and sublime skills but I've also seen Murray legitimately bagel Nadal for the loss of only 4 points in the set and Nadal said Murray was completely unplayable.
What I'm saying is would Federer's A game stand up to that.
Truth is we don't really know.
Ah the old you can't prove it so how can anyone possibly know logic? Fair enough, but the difference here is you have one instance for Murray, maybe a handful overall. If I was to make a case for Federer's A game I could use most of his peak years. With Murray, nobody can do that.