View Single Post
Old 01-24-2013, 09:26 AM   #34
Talk Tennis Guru
TMF's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,407

Originally Posted by Blocker View Post
But he still beat the field whereas Del Potro didn't. I mean, isn't that the argument everytime someone mention's Federer's kryptonite, beating the field?
Pete lost 17/18 times that year and slamless Rios was threaten him, woo hoo !

Del Potro had to deal with 2 slam winners Federer, and Nadal/Nole/Murray. Sampras is lucky not to have anyone challenge him.
Federer > Davydenko > Nadal > Federer
Nadalgaenger: "Djokovic is clearly better than Pete"
TMF is offline   Reply With Quote