View Single Post
Old 01-24-2013, 09:33 AM   #1
sureshs
Bionic Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 32,063
Default Is variety overrated?

Well, I think it was Chrissie's comment, from the voice. She was talking about how Sloane has more variety then Azzy, but how more variety means more things can go wrong (and how Azzy does a few things only and does it very well).

If you look at Djokovic/Nadal vs Federer, do you think Fed's so-called variety is a liability or a strength?
sureshs is offline   Reply With Quote