Originally Posted by Blocker
But he still beat the field whereas Del Potro didn't. I mean, isn't that the argument everytime someone mention's Federer's kryptonite, beating the field?
How much did sampras beat the field by? A little or a lot?
And maybe the field was weak?
I mean, isn't that the argument everytime someone mention's Pete's kryptonite, pete's dominance as compared to other greats (federer, borg etc).