View Single Post
Old 01-24-2013, 04:52 PM   #451
Winners or Errors
Professional
 
Winners or Errors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,427
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Game View Post
first of all, this entire subject is what is known as "OFF TOPIC" to the thread.

edit: and youre right about "continent that became the USA" ... that was a misstatement. guess I should have said "land that became the USA"

boy oh boy. where did you go to school?

Let's take this point by point:

definition of colony:
1 a: a body of people living in a new territory but retaining ties with the parent state.
b: the territory inhabited by such a body.

Question: In what sense does "the Philippines" fit the definition of "colony" of the USA?

edit: the term "native americans" is as inaccurate as calling the people who were living in europe at the time "native europeans." yes, they were all natives of their separate continents, but so what? the tribes of north america were living at the same time as the tribes of europe. they were many individual tribes with individual cultures and identities, some of whom were warlike and some of whom were peaceful. the europeans (roughly the area that recently became the european union) were a relaively warlike people (read the history of the roman empire sometine) with horses and guns (which the north american tribes did not have) and written languages to record everything they did. without written histories, we don't know what the tribes of north america did to each other. At any rate, the Indian Nations of the land that became USA remain sovereign nations. The same cannot be said for the indian nations of the land that became mexico and south america.

hmmmmmmm?
Too many questionable premises above to debate, as it would take the thread far off topic. I'd dispute all of your definitions and interpretations if we had time to sit down and chat about it, but such debates about semantics never get anywhere...
____________________

Back on topic of the thread. Good to see Stephens take out Williams. I was sad to see her get somewhat routinely defeated by Azarenka today, but am hoping she continues to make progress.

I don't really care how Serena played. As with any tennis match, it's what you have on the day you play. Not everyone plays their best every day, and winning ugly is something players have to find a way to do if they're going to be the GWOAT.
__________________
I have come to the conclusion that I simply don't know what I don't know.
Winners or Errors is offline   Reply With Quote