View Single Post
Old 01-25-2013, 08:55 AM   #2
aceroberts13's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100 Miles Away; Ready to Strike
Posts: 1,029

Originally Posted by mistik View Post
I really think that Roger today and before him Agassi is a proof that you can still play some great tennis and be competitive as you get older.I know that Sampras have some early defeats in majors as he gets older but there was still some great tennis left in him after he won his last slam in 2002 Us Open.Sampras could still play some great tennis in 2003 and he might steal some slams against Agassi in AO or more likely 03 Us Open against Roddick. I think on his good day he would still be a more threat to Fed in Wimbledon than the likes of Roddick or Philipossis.I think Roger knows that he is going to lose more than he wins against the likes Nadal,Djokovic and Murray but he still competitive and he can still win like he did in last years Wimbledon, after having not win a slam since his 2010 AO.In a way that is good to see Federer not doing the same mistake like Pete done after he won 2002 Us open.Even at some point someone break his record he wont have any regrets that ı could have done a little bit more,because he is giving himself every possible chance before saying goodby.
As long as Pete walked way from the game when Pete thought it was right, then no mistake was made.
5 x Babolat Pure Storm Ltd. (2008 version)
Looking for GHOATS (Nike Trend Woven Cap) message me!
aceroberts13 is offline   Reply With Quote