Originally Posted by mistik
I really think that Roger today and before him Agassi is a proof that you can still play some great tennis and be competitive as you get older......
Just like Roger and Agassi are proof that if you're a top player, you can win the FO? oh wait...
Sampras is not as good as Federer. He was basically given a free pass by his next gen (Kuerten, Kafelnikov.. really?). If they were as good as Gen X+1 for Federer, Sampras would be languishing in single-digits in slams. Agassi was able to play into his 30s because he had very little mileage in his mid-20s. it's not rocket science.