Originally Posted by fed_rulz
Just like Roger and Agassi are proof that if you're a top player, you can win the FO? oh wait...
Sampras is not as good as Federer. He was basically given a free pass by his next gen (Kuerten, Kafelnikov.. really?). If they were as good as Gen X+1 for Federer, Sampras would be languishing in single-digits in slams. Agassi was able to play into his 30s because he had very little mileage in his mid-20s. it's not rocket science.
Doesn't this suggest that Gen X+1 is not all that good?
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are aggressively certain, while the intelligent are full of doubt.
Last edited by hoodjem : 01-26-2013 at 05:45 AM.