View Single Post
Old 01-25-2013, 02:50 PM   #15
hoodjem
G.O.A.T.
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 11,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fed_rulz View Post
Just like Roger and Agassi are proof that if you're a top player, you can win the FO? oh wait...

Sampras is not as good as Federer. He was basically given a free pass by his next gen (Kuerten, Kafelnikov.. really?). If they were as good as Gen X+1 for Federer, Sampras would be languishing in single-digits in slams. Agassi was able to play into his 30s because he had very little mileage in his mid-20s. it's not rocket science.
Doesn't this suggest that Gen X+1 is not all that good?
__________________
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are aggressively certain, while the intelligent are full of doubt.

Last edited by hoodjem : 01-26-2013 at 05:45 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote