Originally Posted by fed_rulz
Just like Roger and Agassi are proof that if you're a top player, you can win the FO? oh wait...
Sampras is not as good as Federer. He was basically given a free pass by his next gen (Kuerten, Kafelnikov.. really?). If they were as good as Gen X+1 for Federer, Sampras would be languishing in single-digits in slams. Agassi was able to play into his 30s because he had very little mileage in his mid-20s. it's not rocket science.
Doesn't this suggest that Gen X+1 is not all that good?
Step 1: Refute content of argument. If that fails, Step 2: question intelligence of the author. If that fails, Step 3: demonize the messenger.
Last edited by hoodjem; 01-26-2013 at 05:45 AM.