Originally Posted by zagor
Sure, you can still make an argument for any of the 3.
However, Novak won 3 in a row which for me personally puts him at #1 regarding AO.
I agree that's phenomenal.
On the other hand, people like NadalAgassi will make this argument for why Federer is not the best Australian Open player but then use the opposite argument to prove why Sampras, for example, is better than Federer at the U.S. Open. "Only ****s" indeed.