Originally Posted by zagor
Sure, you can still make an argument for any of the 3.
However, Novak won 3 in a row which for me personally puts him at #1 regarding AO.
Just curious, why do you value consecutive slams so much? If the total number of slams won is the same, you could make the case that winning slams over a longer stretch is also impressive as it shows longevity and an ability to compete against likely different competition. In theory, shouldn't it be just as impressive to win a slam across your preprime prime and post prime as it is to win it consecutively during your prime?
Personally I value the sum total of achievements more than I value whether it was done all in one bunch or spread across .