Originally Posted by tacou
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. He just beat Fed to get to the finals? 1-5 in finals is terrible? Explain to me how making six grand slam finals is terrible
While I don't agree with thread, I don't think the poster is saying that 1-5 makes Murray a terrible player, just that it doesn't make him on the level of Fed, Nadal, or Djokovic.
IMO, he is on their elite level in terms of being a player of capable of winning a Slam right now.
He's not on their elite level in terms of accomplishment, though his accomplishments are still obviously great.