Quote:
Originally Posted by CyBorg
It is very much a pseudo-argument, assuming a pseudo-argument is one that doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Your analogies are poor. Unlike Wimbledon, none of these stages were devalued by a pro/amateur split, in which certain players were banned from participating.
So either you are engaging in bad argumentation on purpose or out of ignorance.
|
but who could have beaten the 1970-1971 John Newcombe on fast grass?
It was not Rosewall´s fault that Newk had SUCH peak