View Single Post
Old 01-27-2013, 05:23 PM   #104
ctoth666
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Woodstock, CT
Posts: 770
Send a message via AIM to ctoth666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McEnborg View Post
This Federer criticism is a freaking joke. The guy is HANDS DOWN the greatest player ever. Joko or Nadal might be able to catch him, but they need a lot more wins and longevity.

Federer has lost at least 1/2 or 1 full step and yet, he's still one of the top 4 players in the world.

Does anyone honestly think Joko, Rafa or Murray will be as good at age 31 as Roger is now?? If you do, you're delusional.

Federer in his prime from 2006 beats Murray, Joko and Rafa on hard court 90% of the time. The fact that Roger still gets to GS semis or finals and won Wimbledon last year is amazing. Look at his record, consistency, longevity, and all the indicators--he's the greatest ever. There is NO DEBATE --maybe in 3 or 4 years if Novak and/or Rafa win more slams and titles...BUT NOT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This post is a joke. Guess what? In 2006, Federer lost 2/3 HC matches to Murray, Nadal, and Djokovic. He played each of them once, and only beat Djokovic in the World Group.
ctoth666 is offline   Reply With Quote