Originally Posted by sunny_cali
If you truly believe that Agassi was better when he was 34-35 you should have no problem accepting that Fed's competition during 2003-2004 was as good as it was today. Agassi should be better than Murray/Nadal and perhaps even Djokovic on HC, no ?
Nope Agassi was 33 when he was #1. Try again.
helloworld - "If Nadal wants to surpass Pete, he will need 34 slams, twice more than Federer to be in the same conversation with Sampras."