View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 07:32 PM   #49
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,890

Originally Posted by bhupaes View Post
Hi JW10S, as I understand it, 5263 proposed smart targets as the default strategy, if one didn't have a reason to hit elsewhere. And as per my observation of ATP tennis, that's exactly what the pros seem to do. It's a reference that helps the player avoid putting the ball into the "avoid zone". Even that is not really prohibited if the situation warrants it. Whether 5263 "invented" this scheme is not of great interest to me, but he has certainly been extremely helpful to folks like myself struggling with strategy.
I went back and read the first page in his original thread on the subject--there it does not seem he is talking about a 'default' strategy. So apparently he has backed way off of his original concepts.

Some things good players have in their bag are what I refer to as 'automatic' shots--their default shots. Since there is not always time to decide and set up to hit where you want or how you want everytime players will have an automatic go to shot that will keep them in the point but not put them on the defensive. Then when they have time, opened up the court, acheived good court position, whatever, they pull the trigger. But these automatic shots are situational and not always to the same places.

I've seen point-by-point chartings of patterns of shots of Djokovic, Federer, Murray and Nadal and they each have their own unique patterns of play incorporating automatic shots to ultimately allow them to take control of the point based on their particular strengths and favorite shots. They don't use the same targets, their automatic shots differ. And their automatic forehands differ from their automatic backhands. They will hit deeper to one side of the court and shorter to the other, or wider to one side and more centered to the other based on their strengths and weaknesses and the strengths and weaknesses of their opponents. In many ways it's like chess--how many shots will it take me to get my opponent over there, or to make him hit to me here. It's fascinating when you study it.

I'm surprised someone would need a reference to tell them that dropping the ball into the middle of your opponent's court is something you'd probably wouldn't want to do all that often. When I was 12 yrs old (long time ago) my coach would use tape to mark out a square in the middle of the court, if you hit the ball in it you lost the point. He didn't use a fancy term like 'avoid zone'. But it was a good tool, one I use in my coaching now, hit in the square in the middle of the court, lose the point, but it's certainly nothing groundbreaking.

Last edited by JW10S; 01-28-2013 at 09:01 PM.
JW10S is offline   Reply With Quote