View Single Post
Old 01-29-2013, 12:46 PM   #32
Talk Tennis Guru
TMF's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,407

Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY View Post
Sampras felt he had given his all to his career, and wanted to leave on top--winning a major. It be pointless to continue in major after major, revealing to all the worlds that many have your number and your "prime" is just a distant memory of the past. Think of Federer: he barely won another major after two year bust, and then USO '12, AO '13arrived and passed, with Federer's skills dulled in both. then, there was the Olympics, where he was soundly defeated. He is at the exact point of Sampras--more or less--and needs to consider his legacy.
But Roger continue to play and won Wimbledon, his 17th slams. He also reclaimed the #1 ranking and broke Sampras 286 weeks at #1. The more he play, the more he's adding more to his legacy, thus, distance himself more from the pack.
Federer > Davydenko > Nadal > Federer
Nadalgaenger: "Djokovic is clearly better than Pete"
TMF is online now   Reply With Quote