View Single Post
Old 01-29-2013, 03:11 PM   #26
Hall Of Fame
Anaconda's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,718

Originally Posted by dominikk1985 View Post

I don't think roddick is a lot better than him. in fact ferrer leads roddick h2h 7-4 and a lot of those matches were in roddicks prime before his prime.
Is this a joke? 5 slam finals to 0. 5 MS titles to 0. 30 + titles to whatever Ferrer has (certainly not 30). Roddick has outperformed Ferrer at AO, Wimbledon and the US Open. Roddick was a lot more influential in his DC winning team than Ferrer ever was. Keep in mind Roddick had to face Federer from 2003-2007. Also keep in mind Federer in 2012-2013 is still giving the best of this generation a run for their money.

H2H is pointless. Are you seriously suggesting Ferrer would take Roddick at Wimbledon 2003/2004/2005 or 2009? I think Roddick is a lot better than Ferrer.
Anaconda is offline   Reply With Quote