Originally Posted by veroniquem
It seems we're all wrong here because Sampras has 5 titles and 3 finals at USO, so if # of titles combined with # of finals determines superiority, then it should be Sampras, not Connors.
Regardless, I think 5 consecutive titles is the most impressive feat. But I concede it's arguable.
Sampras was fairly inconsistent. Too inconsistent to be the GOAT, I'd say. One additional final compared to Connors doesn't equal Connors's ridiculous consistency and longevity at the event, IMO.