View Single Post
Old 01-30-2013, 08:59 PM   #31
edmondsm
Legend
 
edmondsm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In an in between place.
Posts: 6,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veroniquem View Post
Looking for an angle I guess but not convincing. Interestingly, Nadal suffered the same accusations. Supposedly, Fed would have the monopoly on "aesthetically pleasing" tennis. Fancy excuse to keep heaping praise on Fed when he loses and take away whatever credit possible from the others when they win. Fed nuts are relentlessly devoted to their cause, you have to give them that.
So angry. Fed's tennis is not just aesthetically pleasing, it's efficient. That's the real reason people admire it so much. Efficiency is the reason that, at 31, Fed can be #2 in the world, make a GS semi, and take the USO champ to 5 sets. All while never so much as breaking a sweat. Nadal and Novak will be lucky if they can walk at 31 the way they play.
__________________
Knock knock. Who's there? Knock knock. Who's there? Knock knock. Who's there? Philip Glass.
edmondsm is offline   Reply With Quote