Originally Posted by abmk
rome 2006 - fed had taken set 4 : 6-2
RG 2006 - fed had taken set 1 : 6-1
Don't bother. It isn't worth it.
He refuses to recognize simple facts, like, for example, that there is a
difference between single event (a set) and a pattern (consequence of matches, featurig the same play, opponents and results at completely different venues and conditions).
Like I wrote, the description is tailormade for him.
Oh, expect that he says, that 6-1 is not like 6-0.