View Single Post
Old 01-31-2013, 01:22 AM   #197
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Inside the service box - the business end
Posts: 3,589

Originally Posted by abmk View Post
rome 2006 - fed had taken set 4 : 6-2
RG 2006 - fed had taken set 1 : 6-1

next ?
Don't bother. It isn't worth it.

He refuses to recognize simple facts, like, for example, that there is a
difference between single event (a set) and a pattern (consequence of matches, featurig the same play, opponents and results at completely different venues and conditions).

Like I wrote, the description is tailormade for him.

Oh, expect that he says, that 6-1 is not like 6-0.
Crisstti:It's not cheating (arguable at best), it's merely breaking the rules./ Vero:Armstrong lacks the arrogance.
Tennis_Hands is offline   Reply With Quote