Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth
I'm not using circular logic. I'm responding to the thread. This thread is designed to compare two generations of players. If you don't think I should do that, you're on the wrong thread. Maybe I should just "go by the numbers" and say, "Federer would be winning 3 Slams a year even now because they just suck" for you to be happy.
Your opinion was that Nadal/Djoker etc are better but not much better than Hewitt/Roddick etc. Since raw accomplishments go against this assertion, the onus is on you to prove this, with a reference point that does not include Fed as it becomes circular logic as soon as Fed is involved .