Thread: Doubles GOAT ?
View Single Post
Old 02-01-2013, 05:16 PM   #147
Hall Of Fame
NadalDramaQueen's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,563

Originally Posted by forzamilan90 View Post
I am one who has negatively called some of these guys here "historian," but used that term not in a sarcastic way. I stand by that. Check it out. Kiki basically admitted today the following:

All that crap he talks about today's game, and how magical the past was, and he barely even follows the tour. Can you say biased here? History's even going after all. Bobby admittedly also has said he ain't following the current tour as much, yet they come out with some quite opinionated, controversial, and supposedly "knowledgeable" statements. All I hear out of kiki's mouth in regards to contemporary tennis: is weak era, Fed's h2h with Nadal, not as good as the old days, f***** Kodes, etc. Not much sage talk there.
Don't let it get to you. There are always people who watch the world pass by.

Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
NadalDramaQueen, I find it a great pity that Dan is already married. Dan&Bobby would be a great couple...
I was thinking more along the lines of the "bromance," which may be the purest form of love.

Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
Forza, Could not be it the other way? That kiki and I followed the current and recent tennis but that we are not too impressed by it?I see enough to be able to judge the modern tennis.
It could be that way, but it isn't.

Originally Posted by pc1 View Post
I was thinking that I was in the Twilight Zone when Dan and BobbyOne were agreeing so readily also. But let's face it, while we may disagree or agree with either of them, they generally know their stuff.
Ah yes, but the only thing that matters is how you use that knowledge.
Consider the set of all sets that have never been considered.
NadalDramaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote