Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
The talk about Murray having a real chance to win RG, or of having a better shot to win RG than Nadal while Nadal still has a pulse, is already enough to laugh off the whole article and anything Wilander especialy says. Ferrer is more a contender to win RG than Murray, and will likely beat Murray again if they play at RG, barring some significant clay improvements from Murray. Heck I would give Del Potro or Berdych more chances to win RG than Murray. The talk about Olderer being more a contender to win RG than Nadal until Nadal has officialy withdrawn from RG or lost several first rounds in a row is also quite the joke. Been on the weed again Mats have we.
Yeah, Wilander is full of it as usual, the guy used to make some sense back in the day but in the last few years he just spews nonsense all the time.
Agassi atleast makes a solid point but as far as I'm concerned as long as Nadal enters FO he's a favourite or at worst a co-favourite with Novak.