Originally Posted by Crisstti
Yes it does, you've said so yourself.
Nope, there's no circumstantial evidence when it comes to Nadal. Him being out injured is NOT circumstantial evidence.
But I'm not wasting any more of my time arguing with you, you don't let anything challenge your preconceived notions.
I do not believe everything on the internet and I never said that the internet is the only source on information.
There is tons of circumstantial evidence re Nadal, not just the absences due to injury. You are too much of a blind fan to see it. You believe everything that comes out of the Nadal camp, that tells me everything I need to know about you. The only thing you question re Nadal is fishing and who gives a hoot about that?
You are right, don't waste any more time arguing with me, you are terrible at it.