View Single Post
Old 02-04-2013, 05:31 PM   #84
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Near a tennis court
Posts: 344

Originally Posted by NoCalParent View Post
Coming from a state with a late kindergarten eligibility date (12/2), I found this study done at the University of Illinois interesting. "Kindergarten Entrance Age and Children’s Achievement: Impacts of State Policies, Family, Background, and Peers" provides summary findings from two longitudinal studies over 15 years. It says,

"First, our baseline models indicate that being a year older at the beginning of kindergarten leads to a 0.53 standard deviation increase in reading test scores and a 0.83 standard deviation increase in math scores during the fall of kindergarten, a point in time so early in the academic year that very little learning has taken place in school. The entrance age effects tend to diminish as children progress through school but are sizable even in eighth grade. Second, we present compelling evidence that entrance age effects are larger among children from high socioeconomic status families than among poorer children. This pattern is consistent with a relatively high rate of accumulation of
human capital among high-income children in the years prior to kindergarten, and suggests that policies intended to raise average entrance ages will exacerbate socioeconomic differences in achievement in early grades. "
This CNN report quoted a Harvard study that shows the advantage of redshirted kids disappears after the 3rd grade. Moreover, redshirted kids are more likely to have behavior problem in classroom.

However, redshirted kids do have an edge in sports, particularly those requiring physical contact, such as hockey, football or basketball. For tennis, the age advantage is not as large. In our section, only one redshirted boy is ranked top 10 in both B16 and B18.
Chemist is offline