Originally Posted by sureshs
We already know that Federer is arrogant and snobbish, and always has an excuse for every loss, like back pain, which is cleverly communicated without appearing to be an excuse. Unlike Nadal, he did not support more pay for lower-ranked players, because he made enough money in a weak era. That is why Nadal is seen as genuine, caring and humble, and also skilled enough to beat Federer any time on any surface. Janowicz is just saying how it is.
This is B.S. Completely untrue. Whatever Janowicz said is his opinion and we don't even know if he said that because I've yet to see the actual interview. Just some recreation on Twitter. Guess what? Twitter's been wrong many many many times. Show me the proof!