View Single Post
Old 02-06-2013, 11:57 AM   #72
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 974

Originally Posted by always_crosscourt View Post
I'd say they're both good 3.5's.

Neither looks at all explosive, their movement is sluggish, their serves are weak, they're inconsistent, they make bad errors (think I saw two netted smashes), the technique looks more to be 'arming' the ball rather than using the kinetic chain (esp. the blue guy). Racket head speed also looks very slow.
That's just ridiculous, sorry. To consider them 4.0s is also unrealistic. Strong 4.5s or low 5.0s sounds about right. Definitely too many unforced errors and technical flaws to be 5.5.
Fugazi is offline   Reply With Quote