Originally Posted by mariecon
Soooooo how did he benefit? He still lost in the SF. That makes no sense. And that is strange logic. Just because something happens one year doesn't mean it will happen the next. For instance: How many times has Nadal defended a tournament title that wasn't on clay? I'll give you three guesses. Beeeep. Wrong. NEVER!!!
So why is Murray on the list? Murray is one the form of his life, there no saying he could or could not beat Nadal, he was already reaching finals even with Nadal not being injured.