View Single Post
Old 02-07-2013, 02:14 PM   #33
WhiskeyEE
Hall Of Fame
 
WhiskeyEE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick3391 View Post
I think he'd have a real hard time with the top 4. He had said there was no way he could have beat Federer, and said "there is no where to go with Federer, no opening or weakness", with the Gazelle type play and return of the other 3 guys, could it be "He had no where to go" as well?

Agassi was great, I think being able to play so close to a prime Fed I'd favor him over the other 3, but we are splitting hairs.
fed is a terrible match up for agassi. he's just too good at dictating play and breaking up agassi's rhythm. I think that peak agassi would beat pusher murray more often than not and win against joker often as well.
__________________
“What Australians don't like is shysters and conmen. And they felt on Sunday night that they - and Wawrinka - were being conned.”
WhiskeyEE is offline   Reply With Quote